NMS HOT POST 2022/10/8

On the recent inventory changes:


First, shut up about things being "overpowered".

People aren't complaining an overpowered thing got nerfed/balanced. People are complaining that they worked 100+ hours for upgrades that are now functionally useless. Going "well it was overpowered anyways" is a complete non-argument when the game is fundamentally noncompetitive. If you work hard to minmax in the game, that is a completely valid playstyle and the schadenfreude displayed to extremely powerful, finely tuned setups being ruined is completely baffling.

Now onto ideas:

Personally I'd prefer that the tech slots be expanded a past the current 30, and probably more critically have better synergies/a higher overload capacity. Having up to 6 modules would be nice if two separate inventories aren't feasible, but honestly in the longer term having more extensive and meaningful synergy interactions across more modules in a single tech inventory would be great and a huge step up from the annoying inventory trade-offs for hyperdrive range, scanner functionality, etc. Fundamentally, I'm totally in favor of a unified inventory, it's just that this really should have been a move to raise, and not lower the ceiling (x-class modules were a really great example imo). Hopefully future patches and updates will build on this framework, instead of just rolling back all the changes and eliminating the promise this new system could hold.

On the off chance HG ends up reading this as part of community feedback scouting:

You guys have done an amazing job pushing out content for this game, but you need to be really careful not to let the near-universal praise goad you into assuming anything is going to fly. The updates thus far have been very much additive and focused on expansion which is why they've been so positively received, but when working on an overhaul that can wipe out hundreds of hours of work you really need to do some more community consultation. Just because your vision and what the community's interests are have aligned thus far is not a guarantee that they'll continue to do so, and I really hope that you all keep up the trend of being great with feedback consideration and adjust accordingly. I have nothing but respect for the hard work you have done, and continue to do – I would hate to see any of it go to waste, and if you'd like an example of good community engagement without destroying hype for updates (or in their case DLCs), I'd strongly recommend taking a look at how the RimWorld dev goes about things.

submitted by /u/Sir_Sanctumonious
[link] [comments]

Source: No Man's Sky | Reddit

関連記事

The repeatability of sandboxing: One game got it right, and NMS could do it too

Hello Gammers, HelloGames … oh well.

Don’t worry, this is constructive. I have over 500h on Permadeath and countless others in other modes and I am soon restarting all over again, I love this game.

These days I was wondering what made me want to actualy play another “open world survival” game that is so much smaller, and I noticed something. That game has somethings very small, easy to implement, but that ends up creating a strange sense of novelty every time you replay. That game is Subnautica.

You see, in Subnautica you have a small dread of the unknown, of finding something … dangerous. Lurking around. So even when you are an experienced player who literally knows where every dangerous area/creature is, it is still thrilling to get near those areas, to enter and dare the big challenge.

I miss that on NMS. The game has none of that, the most danger you get is tame compared to that. And lets face it, in the vastness of the universe, you are just as likelly to find cute rideable unicorn-bears, as something that will eat you – whole.

So why not do this tiny bit change. Some planets can have something powerful, something sinister, either on the depths of the oceans or the high mountains. And they don’t need to be that big, but should be respectable, visible, loud.

The idea is not to put something that will scare users, that will make someone rage quit they lost their progress. The idea is to put something that has fair warning, that tells you “dude, you shouldn’t be here, I hope you know what you are doing”. And if you are up to it, you don’t need rewards, you only need the thrill of slaying that thing, of putting your foot down (because if you add unique rewards to very hard encounters, the more casual players won’t really like it a bit).

Something that I miss in Subnautica (and NMS), is the possibility of large creatures to actually damage your base. Sure, 99.99% of people wouldn’t build a base nowhere near these dangerous creatures, but what if I wanted? what if I want to dare? Build a base with redudancies and extra layers of protection to stand that sandwork, that winged demon? the treachearous boss abomination?

And same in space. From time to time you should bump into something that will scare you. The random encounters right now are silly, you chuckle and go away, mark down one more encounter you hadn’t experienced yet. But what if you encounter something that tells you …. no, not even going to scan it, I’m out of here.

So, a little sense of awe, of dread, not necessarily always leading to death and loss, but to get out of there, or maybe, let’s face this thing!

And its not even hard to do it. Get some big assets, put huge HP, some good damage (but not one-hit kill), and some rules on where it can spawn (planet type, star system type). Maybe even just tweak the already existing random encounters, and then add some 5 new mobs that could even look the same everywhere, but for that reason … you know what it is, and its time to run.

submitted by /u/NoSeriousPosts
[link] [comments]

続きを読む シェア
0

anyone else prefer first person over third person?

ive begun to use first person a lot more. i think its a lot more immersive and atmospheric, and it also makes building a lot less of a headache (of course i use the free camera but sometimes i like to not use it)

i think it also adds another part to the survival element, as it really feels more like you’re the one surviving, instead of just controlling someone else whos surviving.

submitted by /u/peppapigisme
[link] [comments]

続きを読む シェア
0

Community

Ok, all you salty susans. Explain to me how having ship crafting ruins hunting.

Does it mess with your clout? Is the authentication thing not enough for you? Do you have the mental fortitude of a piece of soggy toast and you’re scared you’ll just want to scrap everything you’ll find? Is it a status thing? Do you think finding a ship naturally makes you somehow better than the rest of us?

I don’t get it.

You can still find ships naturally, that never went away. They even come with built-in bragging rights, why are you so mad? What compels you to argue for barring customization for the more exotic ship types?

I’m not trying to be insulting in this post (maybe snarky, but not insulting.) I just don’t agree with you and I don’t see where you’re coming from at all.

submitted by /u/Crvknight
[link] [comments]

続きを読む シェア
0

Ship hunting is one of my favorite parts of No Man's sky and it is NOT ruined

I don’t interact with like 50% of the games content anyway so if something optional like shipbuilding will make me upset I can just ignore it like I ignore pets and farming and auto miners and literally any space combat. I haven’t played the update yet but the one thing that I do hope for is for unmodified naturally generated ships be unmarked while visually customized ships have some kind of tag in the UI. But if not it’s not a big deal.

submitted by /u/OneLifeOneMort
[link] [comments]

続きを読む シェア
0

Popular Posts